Alex W.'s Blog

Citi loses $500M, and why verification UIs should switch context

This is hilarious.

Last August, Citigroup Inc. wired $900 million to some hedge funds by accident. Then it sent a note to the hedge funds saying, oops, sorry about that, please send us the money back. Some did. Others preferred to keep the money. Citi sued them. Yesterday Citi lost, and they got to keep the money. -Matt Levine @ Bloomberg

Here’s the software interface that started the entire saga:

Figure 1. Gray background with metadata at the time followed by a scrollable table with 3 columns: Component, Internal GL, and Overwrite default settlement instruction. 8 rows follow with names like COLLAT and COMPINTSF. All rows are empty except for the last, PRINCIPAL, which is filled in with 3003000023 and a checked 3rd column.

Yes this form is confusing, but I think the truly egregious UX occurred after this form was filled out.

It appears that the two approving users of that $900M wire reviewed the same input screen as Raj, who first initiated the transfer. Showing them the same UI limits the chance they’ll see an error. Alternatively, if they had reviewed a screen showing rows of recipients and pending wire amounts it’s likely they would have caught the mistake.

UI Principles

This exemplifies a UI principal I strongly believe in: verification UIs should switch context.

If you rely on someone reviewing the same UI you are either asking them to be: 1.) more knowledgeable than the first reviewer, 2.) more observant than the first reviewer. Depending on a hierarchy of increasing reviewer competence is untenable. This is worse when you’re reviewing yourself.

Confirmation Emails

Consider traditional forms asking for your email address. Normally they ask you to enter your email twice. But if you were going to enter it wrong the first time, what are the chances you’d get it right the second time? A more common approach nowadays is to send a confirmation message to the email entered; i.e. a new context.

Now you can capture a whole new realm of errors:

Error Double Entry Confirmation Message
Mistyped address
Misremembered address
Misunderstood what the form wanted

The signup form on my.equifax.com follows this old approach (and doesn’t indicate if it will send a confirmation email).

Browser window opened to my.equifax.com. Titled "Create your account". Two email address fields are shown; one is labeled "Confirm email".

Airline Tickets

I think airline ticket websites have this same problem. If you’re trying to double check the destination airport and the dates all you have to work with is the same 3-letter airport code or city name you typed to search and the text formatted date range.

JetBlue selected flight confirmation. Fare: Washington-National, DC [DCA] - Orlando, FL [MCO].

I think airlines should show you a map with the flight path overlaid. Seeing a flight I intended to book to Miami with a flight path to Orlando would allow a different part of my cognitive system flag the error. Including a statement like “departing in 9 days” would also let me think about the dates differently.


Written by Alex Wendland, who is currently exploring fintech at Pinwheel. Here's a Twitter handle, a GitHub, some LinkedIn, ol' Facebook, or a hip Instagram if you're interested.